Leesville Lake vs Pleasant Hill Reservoir
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Leesville Lake has a higher water quality grade (D, Poor) than Pleasant Hill Reservoir (F, Very Poor). Both are in Wisconsin.
Leesville Lake and Pleasant Hill Reservoir are both in Ohio — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The grades are close: Leesville Lake (D) and Pleasant Hill Reservoir (F) are within one letter of each other on the LakeGrade rubric. The per-parameter sub-grades below will show where the small differences actually live.
With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Leesville Lake
Murky, only visible to about 5 ft.
Pleasant Hill Reservoir
Very murky, less than 3 ft of visibility.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Leesville Lake | Pleasant Hill Reservoir |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | D (Poor) | F (Very Poor) |
| Water Clarity | 5 ft | 3 ft |
| Phosphorus | No data | No data |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 1.0K acres | 2.6K acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | eutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Leesville Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade D versus Pleasant Hill Reservoir's Grade F. Water clarity: 5 ft vs 3 ft. For fishing diversity, Leesville Lake also leads with 0 species.