Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Lake Metonga vs Pickerel Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Lake Metonga and Pickerel Lake both received the same overall water quality grade of B (Good). Both are in Forest County, Wisconsin.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Lake Metonga and Pickerel Lake sit in Wisconsin. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Lake Metonga (B) versus Pickerel Lake (B). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

B

Lake Metonga

Forest County, Wisconsin

Crystal clear, you can see 22 ft down.

B

Pickerel Lake

Forest County, Wisconsin

Good clarity, visible to about 10 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricLake MetongaPickerel Lake
Overall GradeB (Good)B (Good)
Water Clarity22 ft10 ft
Phosphorus13.7 µg/L20.4 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No dataNo data
Maximum Depth79 ft19 ft
Surface Area2,038 acres1,272 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species54
Trophic Stateoligotrophicmesotrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade B. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Lake Metonga: 22 ft, Pickerel Lake: 10 ft) and what you want from the lake. Lake Metonga supports more documented fish species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.