Happy Holler Lake vs Limpp Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Happy Holler Lake has a higher water quality grade (C, Fair) than Limpp Lake (F, Very Poor). Both are in Wisconsin.
Both Happy Holler Lake and Limpp Lake sit in Missouri. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. Happy Holler Lake (C) is materially cleaner than Limpp Lake (F). A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — Happy Holler Lake is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
Happy Holler Lake
No clarity data.
Limpp Lake
No clarity data.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Happy Holler Lake | Limpp Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | C (Fair) | F (Very Poor) |
| Water Clarity | No data | No data |
| Phosphorus | 63 µg/L | 196.7 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 12.7 µg/L | 166.5 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 62 acres | 28 acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | hypereutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Happy Holler Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade C versus Limpp Lake's Grade F. For fishing diversity, Happy Holler Lake also leads with 0 species.