Hadlock Pond vs Lake Forest
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Hadlock Pond has a higher water quality grade (B, Good) than Lake Forest (C, Fair). Both are in Wisconsin.
Both Hadlock Pond and Lake Forest sit in New York. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Hadlock Pond (B) versus Lake Forest (C). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Hadlock Pond
Good clarity, visible to about 14.6 ft.
Lake Forest
Moderate clarity, visible to about 8.9 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Hadlock Pond | Lake Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | B (Good) | C (Fair) |
| Water Clarity | 14.6 ft | 8.9 ft |
| Phosphorus | No data | No data |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 194 acres | 28 acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | oligotrophic | mesotrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Hadlock Pond wins on overall water quality with a Grade B versus Lake Forest's Grade C. Water clarity: 14.6 ft vs 8.9 ft. For fishing diversity, Hadlock Pond also leads with 0 species.