Current Lake Marsh vs Laura Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Current Lake Marsh and Laura Lake both received the same overall water quality grade of F (Very Poor). Both are in Minnesota.
Both Current Lake Marsh and Laura Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Current Lake Marsh (F) versus Laura Lake (F). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Current Lake Marsh
Very murky, less than 1.3 ft of visibility.
Laura Lake
Very murky, less than 2 ft of visibility.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Current Lake Marsh | Laura Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | F (Very Poor) | F (Very Poor) |
| Water Clarity | 1.3 ft | 2 ft |
| Phosphorus | No data | No data |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 73 acres | 22 acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 1 |
| Trophic State | hypereutrophic | eutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade F. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Current Lake Marsh: 1.3 ft, Laura Lake: 2 ft) and what you want from the lake. Current Lake Marsh has fewer fish species than Laura Lake.