Cedar Lake vs E. A. Patterson Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
E. A. Patterson Lake has a higher water quality grade (D, Poor) than Cedar Lake (F, Very Poor). Both are in Wisconsin.
Cedar Lake and E. A. Patterson Lake are both in North Dakota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Cedar Lake (F) versus E. A. Patterson Lake (D). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Cedar Lake
Very murky, less than 1.3 ft of visibility.
E. A. Patterson Lake
Murky, only visible to about 5.3 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Cedar Lake | E. A. Patterson Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | F (Very Poor) | D (Poor) |
| Water Clarity | 1.3 ft | 5.3 ft |
| Phosphorus | No data | 262.5 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 53.4 µg/L | 15.9 µg/L |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 210 acres | 2.2K acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | hypereutrophic | eutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
E. A. Patterson Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade D versus Cedar Lake's Grade F. Water clarity: 5.3 ft vs 1.3 ft. For fishing diversity, E. A. Patterson Lake also leads with 0 species.