Beaver Lake vs Truitt Pond
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Beaver Lake has a higher water quality grade (D, Poor) than Truitt Pond (F, Very Poor). Both are in Wisconsin.
Beaver Lake and Truitt Pond are both in New York — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two are within a letter of each other on the rubric — Beaver Lake (D) versus Truitt Pond (F). The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Beaver Lake
Murky, only visible to about 5.5 ft.
Truitt Pond
Very murky, less than 3.2 ft of visibility.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Beaver Lake | Truitt Pond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | D (Poor) | F (Very Poor) |
| Water Clarity | 5.5 ft | 3.2 ft |
| Phosphorus | No data | No data |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 40 acres | 19 acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Unknown |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | eutrophic |
Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).
Verdict
Beaver Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade D versus Truitt Pond's Grade F. Water clarity: 5.5 ft vs 3.2 ft. For fishing diversity, Beaver Lake also leads with 0 species.