Andrew Lake vs Latoka Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Andrew Lake and Latoka Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Douglas County, Minnesota.
Andrew Lake and Latoka Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two sit close on the readings, Andrew Lake versus Latoka Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Andrew Lake
Good clarity, visible to about 13.9 ft.
Latoka Lake
Crystal clear, you can see 19 ft down.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Andrew Lake | Latoka Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 13.9 ft | 19 ft Better |
| Phosphorus | 17 µg/L | 11 µg/L Better |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 4 µg/L | 2.2 µg/L Better |
| Maximum Depth | 83 ft | 108 ft Better |
| Surface Area | 923 acres | 767 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 18 Better | 16 |
| Trophic State | mesotrophic | oligotrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Andrew Lake or Latoka Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Andrew Lake: 13.9 ft, Latoka Lake: 19 ft) and what you want from the lake. Andrew Lake supports more documented fish species.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.