1
Cedar Lake
Wright County, Minnesota · near Swartout Lake
- ++9.7 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (24 vs 489 µg/L)
Cleaner Lakes Than Swartout Lake
4 lakes with lower nutrient and algae readings nearby, ranked by the size of the improvement and by proximity.
Swartout Lake carries nutrient and algae readings on record. Within 30 miles, 4 lakes read lower. Cedar Lake (Wright County) is the closest meaningful upgrade.
Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
2
Pleasant Lake
Wright County, Minnesota · near Swartout Lake
- ++6.9 ft water clarity
- +Lower phosphorus (17 vs 489 µg/L)
3
4
Stays via Stay22
Where to stay near Swartout Lake
Compare cabins, hotels, and vacation rentals around Swartout Lake in Minnesota. The 4 lakes above sit within 30 miles, so one base reaches them all. Switch the map to Satellite to see how close each stay is to the water.
Top-rated places to stay near Swartout Lake
Prices for Oct 16–18, 4 adults. Change dates on the map below.
Availability and prices from Stay22 partners (Booking.com, Vrbo, Expedia). We may earn a commission from bookings, at no extra cost to you.
Planning a trip to Swartout Lake?
Get lake water-quality updates plus the best cabin & lodging deals near Swartout Lake — straight to your inbox. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.
Reading the cohort
Within 30 miles of Swartout Lake, 4 water bodies carry lower nutrient and algae readings on the same EPA water-quality metrics. That density of cleaner options is itself a signal: when several nearby lakes read better on the same indicators, the differences at Swartout Lake are typically lake-specific (depth, watershed inflow, stratification pattern) rather than regional. The choice for a swim, paddle, or fishing trip is genuinely between meaningfully different water bodies, not between marginal differences in the same dataset.
The closest cleaner alternative, Cedar Lake in Wright County, sits miles from Swartout Lake. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to Cedar Lake is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.
Each lake's nutrient and algae readings — total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity — are shown beside the EPA National Lakes Assessment 2022 condition class for that lake's own ecoregion, so a reading is compared against the lakes it would naturally resemble. LakeQuality publishes no letter grade. Lower readings mean measurably less nutrient and algae in the water, not better scenery or access: the lake with the clearest, lowest-nutrient water can have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a neighbor, so the comparison is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. How the readings are classified is on our methodology page.
How this list is built
Sampled lakes on LakeQuality carry readings from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with strictly lower nutrient and algae readings, then rank by the size of the improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.