Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Sandwick Lake and Shallow Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Sandwick Lake and Shallow Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two sit close on the readings, Sandwick Lake versus Shallow Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Sandwick Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 11.6 ft.

Shallow Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Crystal clear, you can see 16.4 ft down.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricSandwick LakeShallow Lake
Water Clarity11.6 ft16.4 ft Better
Phosphorus11 µg/L9 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)3.7 µg/L3.2 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth36 ft85 ft Better
Surface Area594 acres539 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species912 Better
Trophic Statemesotrophicoligotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Sandwick Lake: 11.6 ft, Shallow Lake: 16.4 ft) and what you want from the lake. Sandwick Lake has fewer fish species than Shallow Lake.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.