Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Long Lake and Spider (Ne Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Hubbard County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Long Lake and Spider (Ne Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are close: Long Lake and Spider (Ne Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Long Lake

Hubbard County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 11.2 ft.

Spider (Ne Lake

Hubbard County, Minnesota

Crystal clear, you can see 17.1 ft down.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricLong LakeSpider (Ne Lake
Water Clarity11.2 ft17.1 ft Better
Phosphorus10 µg/L Better11 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)4.5 µg/L3.2 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth135 ft Better96 ft
Surface Area1,926 acres570 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species14 Better13
Trophic Statemesotrophicoligotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Both lakes earn the same Grade A. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Long Lake: 11.2 ft, Spider (Ne Lake: 17.1 ft) and what you want from the lake. Long Lake supports more documented fish species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.