Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Six Mile Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Little Winnibigoshish Lake. Both are in Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Little Winnibigoshish Lake and Six Mile Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are meaningfully apart: Six Mile Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Little Winnibigoshish Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Six Mile Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Little Winnibigoshish Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 8.4 ft.

Six Mile Lake

Cass County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 11.5 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricLittle Winnibigoshish LakeSix Mile Lake
Water Clarity8.4 ft11.5 ft Better
Phosphorus32 µg/L14.5 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)10.5 µg/L6.7 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth28 ft68 ft Better
Surface Area1,002 acres1,323 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1616
Trophic Stateeutrophicmesotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Six Mile Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Little Winnibigoshish Lake. Water clarity: 11.5 ft vs 8.4 ft. For fishing diversity, Six Mile Lake also leads with 16 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.