Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Little Cut Foot Lake vs Little Winnibigoshish Lake

Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.

Little Winnibigoshish Lake has a higher water quality grade (C, Fair) than Little Cut Foot Lake (D, Poor). Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Little Cut Foot Lake and Little Winnibigoshish Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The grades are close: Little Cut Foot Lake (D) and Little Winnibigoshish Lake (C) are within one letter of each other on the LakeGrade rubric. The per-parameter sub-grades below will show where the small differences actually live.

With grades this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

D

Little Cut Foot Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 6.6 ft.

C

Little Winnibigoshish Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 8.4 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricLittle Cut Foot LakeLittle Winnibigoshish Lake
Overall GradeD (Poor)C (Fair)
Water Clarity6.6 ft8.4 ft
Phosphorus42 µg/L32 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No data10.5 µg/L
Maximum Depth20 ft28 ft
Surface Area619 acres1,002 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1516
Trophic Stateeutrophiceutrophic

Bold value = better for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better).

Verdict

Little Winnibigoshish Lake wins on overall water quality with a Grade C versus Little Cut Foot Lake's Grade D. Water clarity: 8.4 ft vs 6.6 ft. For fishing diversity, Little Winnibigoshish Lake also leads with 16 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.