Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Little Winnibigoshish Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Little Cut Foot Lake. Both are in Itasca County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Little Cut Foot Lake and Little Winnibigoshish Lake are both in Minnesota — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. The readings are close: Little Cut Foot Lake and Little Winnibigoshish Lake sit within a narrow band of each other on phosphorus, chlorophyll-a and clarity. The per-parameter table below shows where the small differences actually live.

With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.

Little Cut Foot Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 6.6 ft.

Little Winnibigoshish Lake

Itasca County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 8.4 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricLittle Cut Foot LakeLittle Winnibigoshish Lake
Water Clarity6.6 ft8.4 ft Better
Phosphorus42 µg/L32 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)No data10.5 µg/L
Maximum Depth20 ft28 ft Better
Surface Area619 acres1,002 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1516 Better
Trophic Stateeutrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Little Winnibigoshish Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Little Cut Foot Lake. Water clarity: 8.4 ft vs 6.6 ft. For fishing diversity, Little Winnibigoshish Lake also leads with 16 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.