Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Moose Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Kitchi Lake. Both are in Beltrami County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Kitchi Lake and Moose Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are meaningfully apart: Moose Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Kitchi Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Moose Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Kitchi Lake

Beltrami County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 8.2 ft.

Moose Lake

Beltrami County, Minnesota

Crystal clear, you can see 15.1 ft down.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricKitchi LakeMoose Lake
Water Clarity8.2 ft15.1 ft Better
Phosphorus23 µg/L11 µg/L Better
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)7.5 µg/L2.2 µg/L Better
Maximum Depth50 ft71 ft Better
Surface Area1,865 acres601 acres
Public AccessNoYes
Fish Species16 Better12
Trophic Statemesotrophicoligotrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Moose Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Kitchi Lake. Water clarity: 15.1 ft vs 8.2 ft. For more fish-species variety, Kitchi Lake edges ahead with 16 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.