Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Big Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Blackduck Lake. Both are in Beltrami County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Big Lake and Blackduck Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are meaningfully apart: Big Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Blackduck Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Big Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Big Lake

Beltrami County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 9.7 ft.

Blackduck Lake

Beltrami County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 6.2 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricBig LakeBlackduck Lake
Water Clarity9.7 ft Better6.2 ft
Phosphorus15 µg/L Better34 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)4.8 µg/L Better12.3 µg/L
Maximum Depth35 ft Better28 ft
Surface Area3,598 acres2,711 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species17 Better16
Trophic Statemesotrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Big Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Blackduck Lake. Water clarity: 9.7 ft vs 6.2 ft. For fishing diversity, Big Lake also leads with 17 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.