Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Robeson Creek Lake carries a Grade F (Algae-prone) water quality score. Within 30 miles, 1 lake holds a higher grade. B Everett Jordan Lake (Chatham County, Grade D, 0.9 mi away) is the closest meaningful upgrade.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
1
D

B Everett Jordan Lake

Chatham County, North Carolina · 0.9 mi from Robeson Creek Lake
  • +Higher grade (F → D)

Reading the cohort

Just one nearby water body scores higher than Robeson Creek Lake on the EPA metrics within a 30-mile radius. The single cleaner option (below) is the practical alternative; beyond that, the next-cleanest lakes sit farther out and warrant a longer drive only if the water-quality difference is the deciding factor.

The closest cleaner alternative — B Everett Jordan Lake in Chatham County, Grade D — sits 0.9 miles from Robeson Creek Lake. At that distance, the substitution cost is essentially zero: same drive time, same regional access, demonstrably cleaner water on the EPA indicators. For repeat visitors who care about clarity or phosphorus levels, swapping the routine to B Everett Jordan Lake is mostly a habit change rather than a logistics change.

Lakes are graded A to F on nutrients and algae — total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity — measured against the EPA National Lakes Assessment 2022 condition classes for that lake's own ecoregion, so a lake is judged against the lakes it would naturally resemble. A higher letter reflects measurably lower nutrient and algae levels, not subjective beauty or access quality — a Grade A lake might have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a Grade C neighbor, so the ranking is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. The full grading formula is on our methodology page.

How this list is built

Rated lakes on LakeQuality have a letter from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with a strictly higher numeric score, then rank by grade improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.