Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Chattahoochee River Lake carries nutrient and algae readings on record. Within 30 miles, 2 lakes read lower. Harl Lake (Harris County, Grade A, 21.7 mi away) is the closest meaningful upgrade.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated
1

Harl Lake

Harris County, Georgia · 21.7 mi from Chattahoochee River Lake
  • +Two grade letters higher (C → A)
  • +Lower phosphorus (13 vs 30 µg/L)
2

Harl Lake

Harris County, Georgia · 28.4 mi from Chattahoochee River Lake
  • +Two grade letters higher (C → A)
  • +Lower phosphorus (13 vs 30 µg/L)

Reading the cohort

Only 2 lakes within a 30-mile radius read cleaner than Chattahoochee River Lake on nutrients and algae. The narrow set of options reflects either a fairly clean lake to begin with or a region without a wide range of cleaner alternatives, so the trip-planning decision is more constrained than the headline "cleaner lakes nearby" suggests.

The nearest cleaner alternative — Harl Lake in Harris County — sits 21.7 miles from Chattahoochee River Lake, putting it firmly in "destination trip" rather than "neighborhood swap" range. The water-quality gap has to be the deciding factor; for a casual outing, Chattahoochee River Lake is the practical choice and the cleaner options are reserved for purpose-specific visits.

Each lake's nutrient and algae readings — total phosphorus, total nitrogen, chlorophyll-a, and turbidity — are shown beside the EPA National Lakes Assessment 2022 condition class for that lake's own ecoregion, so a reading is compared against the lakes it would naturally resemble. LakeQuality publishes no letter grade. Lower readings mean measurably less nutrient and algae in the water, not better scenery or access: the lake with the clearest, lowest-nutrient water can have worse boat-launch facilities or shoreline access than a neighbor, so the comparison is one input alongside the rest of trip planning. How the readings are classified is on our methodology page.

How this list is built

Sampled lakes on LakeQuality carry readings from EPA Water Quality Portal samples — nutrients and algae measured against EPA National Lakes Assessment ecoregion classes. Secchi is shown, not scored. To suggest cleaner alternatives, we filter lakes within 30 miles to those with a strictly higher numeric score, then rank by the size of the improvement with a small proximity tiebreak. Cross-state and limited-data lakes are excluded so the list stays locally relevant.