
Green Lane Reservoir vs Lake Nockamixon
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Lake Nockamixon has a higher water quality grade (C, Fair) than Green Lane Reservoir (F, Algae-prone). Both are in Pennsylvania.
Both Green Lane Reservoir and Lake Nockamixon sit in Pennsylvania. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any grade differences here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies grading them. Lake Nockamixon (C) is materially cleaner than Green Lane Reservoir (F). A gap that wide is unlikely to close in a single year of remediation work; it reflects multi-decade differences in the lakes themselves.
For a recreational visitor, the wider grade gap is decisive — Lake Nockamixon is the better water-quality choice. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?
Green Lane Reservoir
No clarity data.
Lake Nockamixon
Murky, only visible to about 4.8 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Green Lane Reservoir | Lake Nockamixon |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Grade | F (Algae-prone) | C (Fair) Better |
| Water Clarity | No data | 4.8 ft |
| Phosphorus | 146 µg/L | 29 µg/L Better |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | 45.6 µg/L | 13.1 µg/L Better |
| Maximum Depth | - | - |
| Surface Area | 779 acres | 1,450 acres |
| Public Access | Unknown | Yes |
| Fish Species | 0 | 0 |
| Trophic State | hypereutrophic | eutrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Verdict
Lake Nockamixon wins on overall water quality with a Grade C versus Green Lane Reservoir's Grade F. For fishing diversity, Lake Nockamixon also leads with 0 species.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.