Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Florida Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Long Lake. Both are in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Florida Lake and Long Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are meaningfully apart: Florida Lake carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Long Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Florida Lake has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Florida Lake

Kandiyohi County, Minnesota

Good clarity, visible to about 12.3 ft.

Long Lake

Kandiyohi County, Minnesota

Murky, only visible to about 5 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricFlorida LakeLong Lake
Water Clarity12.3 ft Better5 ft
Phosphorus20 µg/L Better92 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)3.8 µg/L Better42.3 µg/L
Maximum Depth40 ft Better16 ft
Surface Area705 acres1,573 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species18 Better16
Trophic Statemesotrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Florida Lake reads lower on nutrients and algae than Long Lake. Water clarity: 12.3 ft vs 5 ft. For fishing diversity, Florida Lake also leads with 18 species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.