Enterprise Lake vs Rolling Stone Lake
Water quality, depth, fish species, and recreation comparison.
Enterprise Lake and Rolling Stone Lake read the same on nutrients and algae. Both are in Langlade County, Wisconsin.
Enterprise Lake and Rolling Stone Lake are both in Wisconsin — a same-state head-to-head where the comparison comes down to lake-specific differences in depth, watershed, and monitoring history rather than the broader state-level water-quality regime. These two sit close on the readings, Enterprise Lake versus Rolling Stone Lake. The deciding factors for a recreational visitor are likely physical (depth, access, fish species) rather than water-quality differences.
With readings this close, the choice between the two lakes turns on non-water-quality factors: depth, fish species, public access, distance from home. The per-lake pages below cover all of those.
Enterprise Lake
Murky, only visible to about 4.5 ft.
Rolling Stone Lake
Murky, only visible to about 5.7 ft.
Side-by-Side Metrics
| Metric | Enterprise Lake | Rolling Stone Lake |
|---|---|---|
| Water Clarity | 4.5 ft | 5.7 ft Better |
| Phosphorus | 24.9 µg/L Better | 33.1 µg/L |
| Chlorophyll-a (Algae) | No data | No data |
| Maximum Depth | 27 ft Better | 12 ft |
| Surface Area | 509 acres | 682 acres |
| Public Access | Yes | Yes |
| Fish Species | 6 | 6 |
| Trophic State | eutrophic | eutrophic |
A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.
Swap a lake
Compare Enterprise Lake or Rolling Stone Lake against a different lake.
Verdict
Both lakes earn the same Grade C. The tiebreakers come down to clarity (Enterprise Lake: 4.5 ft, Rolling Stone Lake: 5.7 ft) and what you want from the lake. Enterprise Lake matches its peer on species count.
Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.