Skip to main content
LakeQuality

Crow R Mill Pond reads lower on nutrients and algae than Nest Lake. Both are in Kandiyohi County, Minnesota.

Reviewed by LakeQuality Editorial Team · Updated

Both Crow R Mill Pond and Nest Lake sit in Minnesota. A same-state comparison strips out the state-level water-quality regime as a variable: any differences in the readings here are about the lakes themselves, not the agencies sampling them. The readings are meaningfully apart: Crow R Mill Pond carries clearly lower phosphorus and chlorophyll-a readings than Nest Lake. A spread that wide reflects real underlying differences, in watershed inputs, depth profiles, or monitoring rigor.

For a recreational visitor, the wider gap in the readings is decisive: Crow R Mill Pond has the lower nutrient and algae numbers. For a researcher, the gap is the interesting part: what is different about the two watersheds, and which of those differences is mutable?

Crow R Mill Pond

Kandiyohi County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 7 ft.

Nest Lake

Kandiyohi County, Minnesota

Moderate clarity, visible to about 7 ft.

Side-by-Side Metrics

MetricCrow R Mill PondNest Lake
Water Clarity7 ft7 ft
Phosphorus21 µg/L Better30 µg/L
Chlorophyll-a (Algae)6.7 µg/L Better8.5 µg/L
Maximum Depth14 ft40 ft Better
Surface Area2,290 acres969 acres
Public AccessYesYes
Fish Species1319 Better
Trophic Statemesotrophiceutrophic

A green ✓ marks the better value for that metric (lower phosphorus / chlorophyll = cleaner; higher Secchi / depth / species count = better). Surface area and trophic state carry no tick — a bigger lake is not a better lake.

Verdict

Crow R Mill Pond reads lower on nutrients and algae than Nest Lake. Water clarity: 7 ft vs 7 ft. For more fish-species variety, Nest Lake edges ahead with 19 documented species.

Source: EPA National Aquatic Resource Surveys, 2026.